© piai- stock.adobe.com
<h2><span data-contrast="auto">During scrutiny week at Parliament, NZQA chief executive, Dr Grant Klinkum, confirmed that Year 10 students who sat their writing assessment this year are having their papers marked by an AI tool. </span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></h2>
<p><a href="https://www.schoolnews.co.nz/latest-print-issue/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><b>Read the latest print edition of <em>School News</em> online HERE.</b></a></p>
<p><span data-contrast="auto">Dr Klinkum was questioned by the Education and Workforce Committee on Wednesday 18 June, last week, as part of “scrutiny week”. When asked about NZQA’s use of AI to mark exams he said:</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-contrast="auto">“During May there were around 185,000 literacy and numeracy assessments completed. Around 60,000 of those relate to writing. We are doing a first AI run-through with those writing responses, and 40 percent of those are being human check-marked at the boundary.”</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-contrast="auto">He clarified that students who come close to passing or failing the writing assessment criteria will have their results checked by a human marker. </span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-contrast="auto">Dr Klinkum reminded the committee this system was based on a pilot version of the AI marking tool trialled last year with 36,000 written responses. There were smaller pilots of the AI marking tool in the two preceeding years. </span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><span data-contrast="auto">“The agreement rate by using AI marking is very, very similar to the human-to-human agreement rate. The combination of AI marking plus 40 percent of check-marking gives us an extremely high agreement rate, far higher than human-to-human.”</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span data-contrast="auto">This is the first year that AI marking is no longer in its trial-stages but is being used as a live-tool. </span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-contrast="auto">Year 10 students who sat their literacy and numeracy assessments in May will receive their results in early Term 3. </span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-contrast="auto">In April, Dr Klinkum said the use of the automated marking tool would allow NZQA to return results faster. </span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-contrast="auto">“This enables us to return those assessments to schools and students earlier so that they&#8217;ve got an opportunity to prepare for the next assessment a couple of months later if they have failed the writing assessment first time round.”</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>

Teacher guide for the new PAT tuhituhi | writing assessment for Years 5 to 10…
Banning AI won’t cut it, says one science teacher. So how can schools and teachers…
Are stressed teachers contributing to the dysregulation we see in classrooms? Rebecca Thomas asks in…
Henbury School Principal Sarah Corry offers a candid, heartfelt insight into leadership burnout, resilience, and…
For many of us, calling our teachers by their first names would have been unthinkable.…
NZEI Te Riu Roa is considering legal action against the government for the disestablishment of…
This website uses cookies.