“For the policy to succeed, the support of principals is critical,” president of the NZPF Philip Harding says.
“We have surveyed school principals and it is clear that they do not have confidence that the IES, as a model, can achieve a strong collaborative culture for schools, nor lift the achievement of especially our priority learners.”
The survey showed overwhelming opposition and concern from a sample of over 1000 principals. They said the model was too complex and inflexible in its present form to deliver on its goals, and principals would rather see this money moved closer to classrooms and children, than have it spent on topping up salaries for a few.
“The policy represents a huge investment in a critical area. It is vital that Government doesn’t steamroll another flawed model over the top of a profession holding significant and legitimate concerns.
“Under this model, $90m per year, which represents 90 per cent of this resource, will go to just six per cent of teachers and principals. One third of that money will disappear through taxation. This money would be so much better targeted to enabling collaborative processes releasing and involving all principals, and supporting priority learners,” Mr Harding says.
“Our opposition is not due to the policy’s intent which we support. Principals are quite clear that it is the proposed design that is the problem and it will not land well in the diverse contexts in which schools sit.”
Educators and politicians are trying to address the current teaching shortage through different policy settings.…
Melanie Webber was the president of the secondary school union PPTA Te Wehengarua from 2021…
Wait times for paediatric care is having an impact on young people’s education and the…
Home of the brave, land of the free… except when it comes to books for…
Could a gender achievement gap in maths be due to confidence? Sarah Buckley from the…
The much-delayed English draft curriculum is now out for consultation, generating discussion from teachers.
This website uses cookies.