“In fact, 54 per cent of them were totally opposed, whilst the rest liked some minor aspects, but not the scheme as a whole,” Mr Newman said.
“Principals are questioning whether this is the best way of spending $359 million of new money, supposedly to help improve students’ achievement, when schools are desperate to get real support, such as sufficient psychologists, speech language therapists, behavioural support and the thousands of other ways that this money could have been used, to give real support for student learning, rather than some pie-eyed scheme, dreamed up once again in Wellington, far from the reality of the chalk face.
“The Government can’t say it wasn’t warned about principals’ concerns around this latest idea emanating out of the Beehive. From the start of discussions and throughout discussions, principals have asked repeatedly, ‘Is this the best use of $359 million to support student learning?’ The answer they came up with then, and still do, is simply, No!”
Educators and politicians are trying to address the current teaching shortage through different policy settings.…
Melanie Webber was the president of the secondary school union PPTA Te Wehengarua from 2021…
Wait times for paediatric care is having an impact on young people’s education and the…
Home of the brave, land of the free… except when it comes to books for…
Could a gender achievement gap in maths be due to confidence? Sarah Buckley from the…
The much-delayed English draft curriculum is now out for consultation, generating discussion from teachers.
This website uses cookies.