Categories: Education

Authentic learning with the mobile phone

SN 16 - Cell PhoneSN 16 - Cell PhoneHow much should be spent on ICT devices for students is a contentious subject – a dichotomy between what will best enhance learning versus placing excessive financial demands on schools and parents.

But according to keynote speaker, Dr Jan Herrington, the use of increasingly affordable mobile phones is a much underused resource in enabling additional personalised approaches to learning where students do not have access to computers.

Dr Herrington is professor of education at Murdoch University in Perth. Her recent research has focused on mobile phone design based research and the use of authentic tasks as a central focus for the e-learning courses she runs. She has written several books on the subject. She said that mobile phones were carried by many students of all ages these days but were often just regarded as a disruptive influence by their schools. “I’m thinking, this is such a powerful thing – why aren’t we using it?”

Dr Herrington said mobile phones and similar devices are still used very little in a formal educational learning context and where they were used, it was often very much from the teacher’s perspective. “We can make a much bigger difference if we put these things into the hands of our students.”

She told her audience that a substantial grant from the Australian Learning and Teaching Council had allowed research into enhancing higher education in teaching and learning by using a number of different mobile phones, which eventually led to new pedagogies, a book and a website.

That research had been put to use in western Australia with three groups of about 25 student teachers.

“The way these units are often taught is that we are learning from technologies or about technologies – not learning with technologies. Generally the effect of this is that it is very transitory learning, or lack of transfer – or worse, they’d end up hating the technology. We set out to use these devices as cognitive tools.”

A definition she quoted was: ‘Students cannot use cognitive tools without thinking deeply about the content that they’re learning, and if they choose to use these tools to help them learn, the tools will facilitate the learning process.’ “We set an authentic and a complex task. We gave them a range of different technological tools. We got the students to create a genuine product that they would share with others.”

The results had been very successful, she said.

Explore our latest issue...
School News

School News is not affiliated with any government agency, body or political party. We are an independently owned, family-operated magazine.

Recent Posts

How important is financial education?

Financial education will soon become mandatory, woven into the social studies and maths curriculum. But…

2 days ago

Tumuaki principal speaks: How culture leads learning

Tumuaki Prinicipal Banapa Avatea shares the success he has seen when imbedding culturally sustaining pedagogy…

2 days ago

Learning support gains at cost of women and expert teachers

Increased learning support funding is welcome, but not at the expense of the teaching workforce,…

2 days ago

Kiwi kids once led the world in reading – this 1950s primary school syllabus still has lessons for today

Academics from Auckland University of Technology explain what we can learn from New Zealand's 1950s…

2 days ago

Smart waste, smart schools: Championing waste management

Schools and kura have a special opportunity to foster environmental awareness and eco conscious practices…

2 days ago

What is the government funding? Pre-budget education investment roundup

School News rounds up the education initiatives – both new funding and cuts – that…

1 week ago